The $12 billion project’s prospects do not seem promising as local unions and organizations remained highly skeptical of its community-focused benefits
In a major setback to Wynn’s plans for a $12 billion casino complex in Manhattan’s Hudson Yards, Community Board 4 voted unanimously against a zoning change required for the project to go ahead. The joint-venture proposal by Related Companies and Wynn Resorts has drawn sharp criticism from residents and advocacy groups, who argue the development prioritizes corporate interests over community welfare.
Locals Remain Unconvinced by the Developer’s Arguments
Wednesday’s advisory vote by CB4 reflects overwhelming local opposition to the flashy project. The proposed casino would include an 80-story casino-hotel tower, office spaces, bars, and a residential building. The plan also features a 5.6-acre recreational park meant to benefit the community. However, locals remain skeptical about the project’s overall impact.
Joshua David, co-founder of The High Line, the region’s famous plant-lined elevated parkway, and a long-time Chelsea resident, commented on the matter for the New York Post, describing the proposal as a “Las Vegas-style monstrosity.” He argued that the 80-story tower would irrevocably change the local skyline and drastically influence the carefully planned character of Manhattan’s West Side.
If we wanted to live in Las Vegas, we would live in Las Vegas.
Joshua David, The High Line co-founder
A key point of contention is that planned housing units were drastically cut from nearly 5,800 in initial designs to 1,507, with only 324 being “affordable.” The tower could also cast a substantial shadow over The High Line, permanently damaging the beloved spot. Environmental concerns also loom large as city planning director Dan Garodnick cited “catastrophic traffic and air quality impacts.”
Related Companies and Wynn Will Press On with the Project
The CB4 rejection signals the challenges ahead for Related Companies and Wynn Resorts in their ongoing efforts to secure broader support from city planners and the City Council. State Senator Joseph Addabbo Jr., chair of the Senate Racing, Gaming, and Wagering Committee, was optimistic about the economic possibilities of a Manhattan casino. However, he noted that community input would be crucial moving forward.
Related Companies defended the casino proposal, accusing CB4 of opposing economic development on Manhattan’s West Side. The company nevertheless welcomed the community’s feedback, noting that it would do its best to incorporate elements that could enhance the neighborhood. Related Companies stated they would continue to pursue the project and engage with local authorities.
We are focused on moving forward with local elected officials, who have been committed to pursuing realistic plans that deliver the jobs, housing, and community improvements New York needs today.
Related Companies statement
With intense opposition from local groups and environmental advocates, the Hudson Yards casino remains uncertain. The Hudson Yards controversy underlines the complexities of integrating large-scale projects into dense urban areas, balancing economic development and community impact. The result of this battle may set a precedent for future developments across the city.
